C++之父的妙论

因为喜欢pongba博客的缘故，去他csdn上的老巢拜访了一下；看了其中关于c++语言的几篇博文，颇有些旧情复炽。顺手捎带，拜读了Bill Venners对Bjarne Stroustroup的访谈（一共4部分），一读之下，惊为天人。
Bjarne的语言朴实无华，但是味道极深，有时需要慢慢品味，趁自己还记得住，赶紧贴几句：

• Just because you don’t need OOP or GP for a project doesn’t imply that C is better for that.
• "I wouldn't like to build a tool that could only do what I had been able to imagine for it."
• Design tools don't give you much feedback, so therefore I tend towards the view that you should build a smaller system and grow it into a bigger one. There is a rule of thumb that says that every successful large system is a development of a slightly smaller working system. You apply that rule recursively. 
• "I wouldn't like to build a tool that could only do what I had been able to imagine for it." 
• To quote Kristen Nygaard, programming is understanding. The meaning is: if you don't understand something, you can't code it, and you gain understading trying to code it.  

从访谈内容来看，在兼顾开发效率和运行效率上，c++似乎做得不错。